There have been amazing advances in medicine, and the biggest advances have been in public health.
Sanitation is responsible for virtually all of the improvements in health that have spread to the entire public over the past hundred or so years.
Arguably another advance is vaccination.
But the flu vaccine doesn’t work very well.
Especially, the flu vaccine doesn’t work well with the elderly– the people who are most at risk for complications!
So I wanted you to see this study because it’s showing you how often you can get much better results simply by looking at real research rather than listening to what the drug companies are telling us.
To get the study you first have to understand what colostrum is.
Colostrum is the milk substance that mammals put out for the first minutes, hours or a few days of the life of their young.
Many people do realize that mothers milk changes its composition constantly as the baby gets older.
The biggest most dramatic change occurs at birth, when mother’s milk is called colostrum.
Colostrum is what the mammary glands produce for just the first few days, maybe week.
Colostrum is the most amazing antibacterial, antivirus, pro-immunity substance ever made.
It is difficult to get human colostrum, so pig colostrum is harvested for general use and works just as well as human.
It’s fairly easy to harvest, and although it is expensive, it’s not that expensive.
So these researchers in Italy realize that the flu vaccine, quite simply, sucks.
As I have shown you in a past newsletter, the number of people who get the vaccine, and yet still get the flu, is extremely high.
In fact more people get the flu who have had the vaccine, then you haven’t had the vaccine.
At least, that’s true among older people.
And the complications from the flu vaccine can be very serious indeed.
I just had a good friend who had the flu vaccine about six months ago, against my recommendation, and he’s been sick ever since.
He just fell down a flight of stairs and broke 30 bones.
He was a very alert, capable fellow, a former FBI marksman, and the only reason that I can see for his deterioration is that it started when he got a flu vaccine.
From that point forward, it’s been pretty bad for him.
I think this is quite common, but the causes of sickness and death are not attributed to the flu vaccine, even though they may be from it.
So it’s very useful to know
what you can use instead of the flu vaccine that actually protects you against the flu.
I’m not going to just make statements of my own here.
I’m going to quote the study.
These are all medical doctors, very, very capable and in some cases famous health researchers with PhD’s and decades of study.
None of them have an ax to grind against the flu vaccine.
And yet they say:
In elderly subjects, the immune response seems to be very limited, and therefore, vaccination in these subjects seems to have a minor effect and benefit.
Yes, as I’ve shown you before, elderly people get really no benefit from the flu vaccine.
Studies show this consistently.
And yet public health officials and the drug companies continue targeting elderly people for flu vaccines that don’t work, and that may cause them life-threatening complications.
So to continue with what the study says:
There is also the problem of
the type of virus used for prevention, which may be different from the one that actually causes disease in specific areas, populations, and times.
It’s shocking to realize how crude the process of gathering and concentrating flu virus really is.
At no point do they isolate a virus.
What they do is that they gather fluids from ducks and pigs, and they inject this fluid into eggs, and attempt to identify egg cells that are sick under a microscope.
If the cell seems sick, they take samples from those sick cell embryos, and they inject it into an embryo in an egg that isn’t sick.
This is called passaging the virus.
And they keep passing the fluid from one egg to the next.
And I mean egg, chicken egg, duck egg.
In some cases they use human cancer cells to pass the virus– but the only way to know that the virus is there is to observe the sick cells and assume it’s because of the injected fluid originally from the pig or from the duck.
It’s very crude.
You will not believe how crude it is.
There’s no way to really know what’s in these infected fluids either.
And so these viruses and these infected fluids and these vaccines tend to trigger some serious immune responses in people:
The use of vaccination in subjects with severe immuno- logic and inflammatory disorderscan be also questioned because most vaccines may not be safe,
This is not me talking, this is the study.
This is a large number of well-educated skilled researchers that have PhD’s and have been studying this for their entire adult life.
These doctors are telling you that the flu vaccine is not safe.
And they are explaining to you why it is not safe.
Now that you know how crude the actual virus “concentration” process is, you can understand this next comment that the researchers make in their paper and study:
long-term effects may result from elements present in the vaccination material that are presently unknown, such as unknown viral fractions.
Nobody has any idea what viruses are present in these vaccines.
It is impossible isolate them.
People talk about isolating viruses, when they don’t really know how the process works.
The only way these viruses are known to cause flu, is when fluid containing these viruses and many other unknown viruses are injected into egg embryos or human cancer cells… and that are then used by vaccine companies to create vaccines.
And the only way to know that there’s virus in these fluids is just to observe the cells that are injected, and see that they get sick.
There’s no way to know what viruses make them sick, or what it is in the fluid that’s making them sick.
So when you get a vaccine, you’re getting a whole host of unknown substances, viruses, retroviruses, and who knows what else.
Not to mention a long list of very dangerous chemicals called adjuvenants that include mercury– large amounts of it too.
So here’s the option that these researchers discovered.
The researchers used a concept called “intention to treat”, so a single intention-to-treat event means that somebody got the flu or some kind of symptoms that made them want to go to the doctor and get it diagnosed and treated.
So the first shocker for some people is that
The number of untreated people who got the flu was 50% less than the number of VACCINATED people who got the flu!
As I’ve said many times, the flu shot is more likely to give you the flu, than just going without and seeing what happens.
That’s what the study showed.
It’s one of MANY studies that show the same thing, including studies financed by vaccine manufacturers.
So the way to get less flu is not to get the flu shot!
And if you think this study included just young people you’re wrong.
The study went all the way up to 80-year-olds.
Now it gets more interesting when you look at the group getting colostrum.
Because the group getting colostrum had a fraction of the intention-to-treat events of the vaccinated people or the untreated people.
The colostrum group got the flu about 50% less than the untreated group, or the vaccination group.
Then they studied high risk people who had a lot of heart problems.
And they did the similar protocol for them.
They found the differences in flu between colostrum and non-colostrum subjects even MORE striking when they treated VERY sick people:
Colostrum, both in healthy subjects and high-risk cardiovascular patients, is at least 3 times more effective than vaccination to prevent flu and is very cost-effective
They used 400 mg of colostrum in the study.
They did not use any other antibiotics or antiviral drugs.
I’m not recommending this brand, but a casual search of colostrum finds many many brands like this, they cost around $15, and that would be more than enough to treat everyone in your household, during flu season.
Citations
Prevention of Influenza Episodes With Colostrum Compared With Vaccination in Healthy and High-Risk Cardiovascular Subjects: The Epidemiologic Study in San Valentino
http://cat.sagepub.com/content/13/2/130.long
Click for more information on Prevention of Influenza, for information on Diet & Exercise, or for more on Common Cold.